Sasha JaegerBaird - CNP Election 2013
RSS Become a Fan

Recent Posts

13 Strange Canadian Laws You Never Knew Existed
Crowsnest Pass Making History
Municipal Inspection set to begin in the Crowsnest Pass
Introducing: The NEW Improved Crowsnest Pass
Monthly Ratepayer's Public Meeting

Most Popular Posts

Neglecting Our Past...... (Please Read This)
What one man thinks of politics and federal elections
Upcoming Lunar Eclipse
Results Of The Meeting With the Mayor, Council & Administration
Report on CNP RatePayers Open Public Meeting - Hillcrest Miner's Club Thursday October 11, 2012

Categories

2010 CNP Election
2010 Election Results
Around Alberta
Council
Crowsnest Pass Events & Happenings
Crowsnest Pass Ratepayer's Association
Daily Blog
Happy Holiday's
Humor
In & Around Canada
In And Around The Crowsnest Pass
Interesting Stuff
Just Another Day...
List of Candidates
Misc. Site Info.
Musings
On The Campaign Trail
Polls
Reporting on the Municipality
Rum Runner Day's
School Busing
Special Day's
The Issues
The World Around Us
What The Heck???

Archives

April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010

powered by

Sasha Speak's

Council

Municipal Press Release Tuesday December 4th - In Response to Municipal Affairs Letter

NEWS RELEASE | Tuesday, December 4, 2012

Mayor and Council Welcome Minister's Involvement

Inquiry will help to confirm practices and policies of Crowsnest Pass government

(Crowsnest Pass, AB.) Yesterday, in a letter sent to Crowsnest Pass Mayor Bruce Decoux, Alberta's Minister of Municipal Affairs Doug Griffiths advised that he will conduct a municipal inspection of the policies and practices of the municipality in response to a petition received by his office. According to the Minister's letter, the objective of the inspection was "to support the role of Council and administration in providing local government services in the community."

"We welcome Minister Griffith's review of our community's practices and policies and appreciate the inspection's importance in clarifying the value of the services and decisions that we make each and every day to support Crowsnest Pass," said Mayor Bruce Decoux. "We value the fact that the Municipal Government Act within this province allows for checks and balances in the operations of local governments so as to protect communities and individuals. Having an oversight system in place strengthens democracy and helps to build strong and vibrant communities," said Decoux.

Mayor Decoux and Council are determined to ensure that community members feel confident in their local government and the decisions that are made on behalf of our citizens. According to the Minister's letter, an inspector will be appointed who will have broad access to any matter connected with the management, administration or operation of the municipality. Once complete, the inspection report is generally presented in an advertised public meeting.

"Council and our administration will continue to serve in an open and transparent manner and we will continue to be accessible to the community we serve and to make decisions that will strengthen our community which we all value," said Mayor Decoux. "We will do everything in our power to support the Ministry of Municipal Affairs as it moves forward with its inspection."

For more information contact:

Myron Thompson, Chief Administrative Officer Municipality of Crowsnest Pass cao@crowsnestpass.com | 403-563-2201

Letter to the Editor From Ratepayer Melody Michalsky

In Today's Pass Herald there is a Letter to the Editor from Ratepayer Melody Michalsky.

It pretty much sums up what many people in the Crowsnest Pass are thinking and feeling.

As copied directly from the Pass Herald, here it is in it's entirety:

Without respect for the members of this community you are not leading

Dear Editor:

The following letter was sent to Mayor Decoux and council.

I am a Rate Payer, a mother of a Fireman and a wife of a Fireman. Most importantly, I am a citizen of the Crowsnest Pass. I have heard your CAO speak on the radio and have read documentation of your responses to the Rate Payers in your special meeting of Oct. 9, 2012. I have concerns regarding your leadership, your vision and most importantly your implementation of that vision.

I recognize change is difficult for everyone at every level of life. How change is implemented is the critical element that determines how well people accept and embrace change. You are currently under a great deal of criticism due to the methods you have used to bring about change.

It is well known within any organization that the process by which you bring in change is more critical than the change itself. Companies, individuals, and governments can make wonderful changes but if not done right will not have the backing and support of people.

Your process has left this community angry, hurt and bewildered. Your lack of attention to a good change process has led many citizens of this community to feel under-valued, bullied, and hurt. This is not the fault of the citizens but of the leadership.

As I said before I am a mother and spouse to Firemen. Your CAO refers to them as employees and due to their protest expressed justification in sending them termination letters. He has portrayed them as unprofessional and discredited their countless years of committed service to this community.

I have in the past 17 years watched my family members leap out of bed in the middle of the night, stand for hours on a roadside flagging traffic in brutal conditions and attack structure fires. They deliver food hampers, host activities for charities and go to schools to teach youngsters Fire Safety. Yes, they were provided a pittance of income for some of these efforts but in their minds they were doing it as volunteers and the funds provided to them was of no consequence. The pride they felt at serving their community was immense. They met each challenge with professionalism and commitment.

Your CAO took the opportunity of a demonstration to strip them of that pride and devalue their incredible contributions as volunteers. I found it intriguing that the Reporter of CBC repeatedly and accurately referred to our Firemen as Volunteers and your CAO repeatedly referred to them as employees. This diminished their contribution and implied a Master/Servant relationship. Despite his insistence that the Firemen were employees the local paper now has an ad "recruiting volunteer Fire Fighters." Where is the honesty, integrity, and ethics in our leadership?

Members of the Pool Board have as well received termination letters. More volunteers devalued.

You speak of a master plan, moving to the future, bringing the Crowsnest Pass into the 21st century. Is that a lofty enough goal to destroy the community spirit in the process? Truly the end does not warrant the means.

Your devaluation of Volunteers within this community has caused the anger and the opposition. You cannot lead people by force. A good leader sets out a course, engages people and encourages and supports along the way. A good leader recognizes the strengths and contributions of those they are leading. You, as a Mayor and Council need to learn how to lead a change process if you want it to be successful and if you wish to remain in a leadership role.

Lastly I must comment on your remarks that you were voted in to bring in change. Yes, change was needed as we previously had a Council that was very divided. You have achieved unity within Council but to agree with each other yet not be connected to the community, what good is your unity? Without solid communication, on going consultation, and respect for the members of this community you are not leading.

Melody Michalsky


This month's Mayor's Corner - October Newsletter

Municipality of Crowsnest Pass

NEWSLETTER # 65  October 15th, 2012

MAYOR'S CORNER


It’s October and fall is here: Clear, bluer than blue skies, trees turning yellow and frosty crisp mornings. Your Council is pressing hard to continue the progress and change we promised.

This month we have had an unfortunate occurrence which resulted in a number of our firemen leaving their positions. However our administrative team managed the situation professionally and we are assured of our safety. I understand some firemen are currently re-applying for their position. Our head of Protective Services and our new Fire Chief inform us that the restructured fire service will be smaller, more efficient in its use of equipment and ultimately more cost effective contrary to some opinions expressed.

We also met with the ratepayers group. Personally I found it to be an enjoyable civil discussion in which there was an exchange of facts versus rumor, the clarification of Council objectives versus misconceptions, and a discussion of long term Council goals.  Perhaps most importantly we discussed the philosophical lens through which we both view the current and future status of our community. It was determined that Council has  a “glass half full” philosophy as opposed to the ratepayers “glass half empty” outlook. It was a good discussion and we agreed to disagree on some points. At the conclusion of our discussion Mr. Kovach surprised us (after such excellent discussion) by requesting that the administration reverse their decisions regarding the fire service and that the Council resign?

After such an excellent productive discussion we all gave our heads a shake of consternation.

I note that once again some individual is instigating another Council recall and our ratepayers group is requesting government intervention. This seems to be becoming a habit. If with every Council you disagree with the elected representatives – petition the government and throw them out.  Can you imagine what would happen across this province if this occurred in every community? I wonder what kind of impression we are creating with the government?

It appears one of our newspapers is unhappy with us and has contacted the newspaper association regarding our approach to advertising.  At this time I am unaware of the details but I expect we will find out in due course.

Now on to more positive items. Please note elsewhere in this issue the various locations in which our newsletter can be picked up. We are receiving an amazing number of requests for the newsletter and many requests to publish it twice a month. I don’t think we can handle that but we will look into it. It seems like people like to have the facts.

I am pleased to announce that after months (and months) of hard work we have as promised, resolved the problem surrounding the Crowsnest Learning Centre and “old” hospital facility. The new hotel restaurant truck stop complex - is a go! The last few legal details are being ironed out and early next month we and the developers are looking forward to holding a public session to gather your input as to what you would like to see happen. Watch our website or the upcoming newsletter for information.

On the manufacturing plant status, I phoned them last week. They have confirmed that we are the location they wish to locate in. This plant produces a lot of clean hot water which needs to be cooled before it can be put back in the environment and apparently this is proving a major problem for them and delaying their decision. The moment I know what their decision is I will inform you.

We are currently in discussion with an international heavy industry which is considering Crowsnest Pass as its base.

A week ago another Canadian heavy industry contacted me by phone and will be setting up a meeting with us shortly. I wouldn’t get too excited over these latter comments just yet as I believe these industries are just in the “speculation” stage.

As previously indicated your Council is working steadily on all issues. Following Mayor’s Corner you will find a letter sent directly to the Premier regarding our ongoing concerns over Highway No. 3.

In conclusion for this month I note that rumor and misinformation is still being propagated by a small minority. This suggests we need to intensify our efforts to bring you the facts and the truth. Please don’t hesitate to contact our municipal administration, our councillors or myself for the facts and the truth.    
                           
- Mayor Decoux

Results Of The Meeting With the Mayor, Council & Administration

Let me start this Blog entry by saying that today's meeting with council and administration, was a very long winded one and my report of it, is equally as long winded. Consider yourself forewarned. :-)


Today, October 9th, 2012, at 3:00 p.m., the Executive of the Rate Payer's Association met with the Mayor, Council and some members of administration, for a "special" meeting, at the MDM building.

Those in attendance were:

Council members: the Mayor - Bruce Decoux, Andrew Saje, Larry Mitchell, Brian Gallant, Jerry Lonsbury & almost an hour late to the meeting came Emile Saindon.

Councillor Siegbert Gail was conspicuously absent.

Administration in Attendance: CAO - Myron Thompson, CFO - Marion Vanoni, Director of Protective and Community Services - Albert Headrick, the New Fire Chief - Steve Munshaw and secretary/recorder - Carolee Ison.

Executive of the Rate Payer's Association: President - Bill Kovach, Vice President & Hillcrest Representative - Larry Ruzek, Coleman Representative - Sasha JaegerBaird, Hillcrest Representative - Rudy Pagnucco, Bellevue Representative's - Gail Montgomery & Troy Clark, Blairmore/Frank Representative's - Marilyn Milley & Marlene Anctil, Secretary - Doreen Glavin & Treasurer - Elsie Linderman. Absent was Coleman Representative - Ed Strembicki.

Media in attendance were: Pass Promoter - Joni MacFarlane, Pass Herald Reporter - Lindsay Goss, CJPR - Randy Spencer, Global Television Reporter - Quinn Campbell & Alternative Media - John Prince.

The meeting was originally scheduled for 2:00 p.m. It was changed to start at 3:00 p.m. due to some council members who could not make it for the 2:00 p.m. start time. The Rate Payer's Executive arrived at 2:35 p.m. and were asked to wait in the hallway, while council and administration conversed. The Media and the Rate Payer's Executive were asked to join the room at 2:50 p.m.

The "special" meeting commenced at 2:55 p.m.

The meeting started with the Mayor asking us to agree on an end time for the meeting of 4:30 p.m. (which later was changed to accommodate the list of issues not yet covered by this time).

The Mayor stated that we would run this "special" meeting like a normal council meeting, in that we would run our statements/questions through him to other members of council and administration and visa versa.

He then turned the floor over to the Rate Payer's President Bill Kovach, who represented the Rate Payer's Executive through this meeting.

Bill started with addressing the Triennial Budget. He made the request that council scrap the Triennial Budget and go back to the way it was before. He stated that this type of budget was made for a community which is both prosperous and growing, of which we are neither.

He suggested that a new budget be drafted up for 2013 (as an  annual budget). He said that this was both realistic and economically feasible and one which the community can live with.

He then stated that council should enter into a referendum of agreement to cut spending that meaning, not being allowed to raise taxes, fees, levies and service costs to balance the budget.

This request was met with a response by both Brian Gallant and Marion Vanoni.

It was explained that this kind of budget was becoming the norm everywhere and that very soon Municipal Affairs would expect every Municipality to use this kind of budget.

Brian Gallant said that it was very normal nowadays for most places to utilize a 3-5 year budget and a 5-10 year Capital Plan.

Marion explained that this type of budget was a "Living Document" and could and would be changed and updated as necessary. She said that our Strategic Plan was also a "Living Document" and it, too, could and would be changed as needed.

She went onto say that until 2007 the Crowsnest Pass has run in a deficit position. In 2007 was the first time that this Municipality could take the surplus created, to pay down that deficit. She also said that the budget would be reviewed every year and be adjusted "as we go".

Brian said this was all part of a "Long Term Plan" for the Municipality.

Next issue addressed by Bill was the budget and financial information requested by the Rate Payers Association, from Myron Thompson, way back in the beginning of August that we still, as of today, not received, even though we were told that we would have it by Mid-September.

Myron jumped right in to explain that it had been on the internet.

Bill replied that those numbers were wrong and not broken down enough.

Myron then handed Bill a large stack of papers that, according to him, are the correct and requested information. Bill told council we would go through them.

Myron then offered to sit down with the Rate Payer's Executive anytime, and go over the numbers.

It was also suggested by Myron, that the Rate Payer's Executive be there on October 22nd, when council and administration go over the upcoming budget.

Bill then addressed "Excessive Spending" and that it should be stopped. He said that effective immediately Council and administration should get rid of the consultants and redundant staff and to begin to trim the bureaucratic fat.

The Mayor, Bruce Decoux, responded to this by saying that he and council were just preparing for success. He said that they liked to look at the glass as half full, rather than half empty.

Bill brought up the increased interest rate, taxes and levies.

Jerry Lonsbury jumped in by stating very vehemently that "his" Municipal Levy has not increased much in over the last 10 years. He provided us with a breakdown of his Tax Assessment. He said that in 2002 his Municipal Tax Levy was $2,276.53 and now, in 2012, it is $2,288,14, an increase of only $11.61 in almost 10 years.

Bill responded that Jerry was pretty lucky and that many of the rest of us taxpayers are not quite so fortunate.

Bill then brought up the increased interest rate that is supposed to be now imposed on off-site levies. He said that it was not a good way to encourage new people to the community by charging them so much.

Larry Mitchell then interjected by telling us that the interest on the offsite levies is no longer in effect. (a win for us)

Myron told us that the levies have not been addressed in over 12 years. He said that they were now either inline with other similar communities or even lower.

Brian then stated that the levies are currently paid for or subsidized by us, the taxpayers. He said that council has decided to shift the burden/responsibility back on the home owner and off of the taxpayers. He indicated that we, as tax payers, should be very happy with this decision.

Bill then went on to bring up the Peace Officer Program and the added expense that this program has put upon the taxpayers. He said that it was a major concern expressed by the public. He went on to say that council should cancel or opt out of the Provincial Peace Officer Program. He said that the majority of taxpayers agree that all we need is one very efficient Bylaw Officer. We need one that just enforces bylaws not spending all the time issuing highway speeding tickets. Bill went on to say that we already have substantial and free RCMP patrolling our area and doing it efficiently as well.

He said that the Enforcement pie on the chart on the Municipal website is $810,000.00. He said that we want to know where that money is coming from. He said that Protective Services is separate and is $650,000.00.

Bruce said that he would turn it over to Marion to explain, however there were good reasons for the program and then he would address this issue again later in the meeting.

Marion responded with several operational costs and numbers. She also said that the amounts included the Agriculture Program and Animal Control. She said that tax levies were are $320,000.000 and the mill rate was $1,000,000.00.

Brian Gallant also responded as to why we have a Peace Officer Program in place. He said that it is to make this a better and safer place in which to live and attract new people and business. He said that one person can not patrol this entire community. He said that some good news is that only 2 bylaw tickets have been issued in the last month. He said that most bylaw infractions have been handled by simple communication between the Peace Officers and the person involved, without the issuing of tickets.

He said that the Peace Officer Program is a great revenue generator for the municipality. He said that other communities that have them have more than paid for themselves and made money. He cited Longview and it being know as a place you better slow down or get a ticket.  He said that we could be like them, making tons of money from the tickets issued on the highway, especially on long weekends by city people speeding.

Bruce went on to state that our long standing "Peace Officer" - Bylaw Officer that we have had for years, was "illegitimate". Bruce explained to us that these fellows who did the job over the past many years, were never approved to do Peace Officer duties, even though they applied to the program. This was due to a clerical/administrative issue that was never rectified with the Provincial Government.

Bruce said that our past Bylaw Officers were doing Peace Officer duties, but only had the authority of a Bylaw Officer. As a result, most infractions that they dealt with and decisions that they made, were continuously overturned by council. Then they would quit, because they had felt that they had no authority.

Bruce said that this decision to bring in a Peace Officer Program, was a long time coming and a good one for our community. He said that by having a Peace Officer, instead of a Bylaw Officer, all complaints, issues and tickets will now be handled through the court of Queen's Bench and not the Municipality. 

He went on to say that a lot of our old bylaws were wrong. They were either worded wrong or just incorrect. He said that council and administration are now in the process of updating and correcting them.

He also went on to say that as of right now, there are 280 unsightly premises on the books, that need dealing with.

He stated that "We need to clean up the community!!! We need bylaws with teeth, to clean it up."

He said that it is also a safety factor. We need good protection to attract new people to this community, but he would talk more on that topic later in the meeting.

He said that we need two Peace Officers to cover both shifts, evenings and weekends. 

Albert Headrick took a turn to talk, saying that proper safety affects our quality of life. He said we need enforcement in place to ensure things are okay once we push tourism. He said that our Peace Officers compliment the local RCMP. He said that the RCMP's priority is crime, not enforcment or writing tickets. He said that the Peace Officer Program is a joint venture with the RCMP.

Marlene Anctil asked why it seems like quite often we see the two Peace Officers in the truck together, if in fact we have two of them in order to cover all shifts.

Albert replied that is could be several things. He said that it might in fact be a RCMP officer with the Peace Officer doing a ride-along. He asked why send two trucks when they can ride together? He also said that sometimes the two go out together when they have a known "problem person" to deal with. He also said that the one was still training when it comes to several things and they will go together while he is training.

The Mayor finished by saying that there are several people on a special "watch list". He said that they are known aggressive people. He said that when this happens that the Peace Officer must deal with this person, then they quite often go together. He said that this type of call "needs" two people to respond to it. He cited the recent beating of our Bylaw Officer as an example.

Bill then addressed the Fire Budget, the Firemen Walkout Protest and the firing of Fire Chief Jamie Margetek. He strongly suggested that council and administration reinstate our Voluntary Firefighters and follow their departmental budget which was realistic and cost effective. He said that this will save a bundle as it would get rid of our new Fire Chief (whom we don't need) and the cost of the paid firefighters, which has currently been implemented. He asked if we keep it the way it is today, where exactly is this money going to come from, other than from us, the already strapped taxpayer?

Albert and the new Fire Chief, Steve Munshaw, were directed to reply to this.

Albert addressed the Fire Protection Issue. He said that Fire Protection and technology have evolved and changed greatly through the years. He said that the main concerns were now structure, operational guidelines and efficiency. He said that it was extremely important that these things need to be addressed and soon. He said that the current Fire Department Chiefs do not have the time and could not be expected to deal with these issues. Therefore that is why we need a Fire chief. That this change has been along time coming and that all four Fire Departments were aware of this needing to happen. He said that nowadays it is all about due diligence.

He said that the Master Fire Plan has been in the works for awhile now. As has the Fire Station Location study. He said that this Fire Station Location Study would be good for us because it would lead to cost effectiveness, better coverage, the elimination of duplicate services and provide a better level of services. He said that the firemen knew about this. It is no surprise to them. They have been consulted and included in the process.

Steve Munshaw said that he had a meeting with several of the firefighters on Sunday. He said that communication has been restarted with them and many of them are on board with the new structure, contrary to what is being said around the community.

Albert jumped back in to say that with the new program the firemen will be providing better service than what we have now.

Brian Gallant went on to say he has nothing against the current firemen. He stated that he respects them and thinks that they do a good job, but not the best job that they could potentially do. He said that they they need more training to be better. That they are not up to the current standards. They are the same today that they have been for a very long time. They need to move forward and get the proper training.

Albert said that when he sits down with the firemen, to go over the New Master Fire Plan, he would like to include the Rate Payer's Executive in that discussion.

Andrew Saje then asked what the budget was from the voluntary firefighters. He directed this question to administration.

Marion said that she did not have their figures and went on to change the subject. She asked the question about whether we really need an aerial ladder, if we need a new one or could we buy a good used one, in fact why do we even need to buy on at all??

Marilyn echoed this question and asked about the the platform that the Municipality currently has.

Albert said that we already have a 1976 King 80 foot platform, but it is not insurance worthy. He also addressed buying a used one, stating that we get what we pay for. If we buy a $250,000.00 used one, then we will have $250,000.00 worth of other people old problems. He said that a new one would run over a million dollars. He went on to say that the best idea was getting one through a joint purchase with another Municipality. This way they can buy in bulk saving much money and maybe even getting  a new one for $500,00.00 - $600,000.00 instead of a new one for over $1,000,000.00. He then went on to ask, do we even need one? Do we even have the water capacity for one? He says that currently they are doing an equipment review.

Brian told us that Fire Department costs have not gone up as we think they have. He said that instead the amounts in the past have not be allocated into the right budget. The Municipality has currently allocated $225,00.00 this year and $225,000.00 next year, for a quint, but will not be able to buy one for this price. He said that we also have to replace our fire equipment. He stated that our fire fighters are under-trained and need to meet current standards.

Bill asked who is it that says that we need to replace the current equipment?

Myron then told us that even if we looked into a used quint we would have to set aside $225,000.00 this year and an additional $225,000.00 next year. He also said that we would still be in a situation where we would need to borrow the money for one.

Andrew asked if the information would be in the budget at the end of the month.

Brian said that everything was being paid for, but in different budgets. He said that now they are all under one budget. He said it only looks like a lot more money.

Albert was then asked by Marilyn Milley, with his 37 years experience of firefighting, why he did not apply for the position of Fire Chief? And also could our voluntary fire chief could report directly to him?

Albert very strongly went on to say that we need a full time Fire Chief!!!! He said that it has been in the plans for many years. He stated that it is all very complicated. He says that everyone needs a life outside of their work position. He said that many things need to be done. He said that with his current position, he is too busy to deal with fire protection full time, andthat he was responsible to so many other facilities and departments that he just didn't have time. He again stated that we need a full time Fire Chief to do all of these things that need doing!!

Myron said that there was to be many new things implemented regarding fire protection, such as public awareness and education and in house training to save costs, that the new Fire Chief would be doing.

Bill asked Steve Munshaw if he was certified to be a fire inspector. Steve replied that he pretty much had everything that he would need except that he has to apply for the license and take an exam.

The next subject that Bill brought up was the Chinook Pipeline's Lawsuit. He asked if the Municipality loses the lawsuit, where will the money come from to pay for it?

Bruce addressed that topic. He stated that "We will NOT lose it!!"

He went on to say "However, if we do, the Municipality's insurance will cover it".

Brian jumped in, saying that in his experience and judgement, the Municipality is NOT in the wrong!!

Bill then addressed the Devon Gas Plant Closure Issue. He asked if council has considered the cost replacement method (new tax base) now that the Municipality has lost Devon. Where will that tax base come from??? What will offset the loss??

Mayor Bruce replied. He again brought up the new light manufacturing plant that is expected to make the Crowsnest Pass its new home. He said that it will employ 70 people once it is up and running but abut 30 people to start. He said that we are the company's first choice for location. He went on to say that the only thing stopping it from moving ahead, at the current time, is an issue with how to put clean hot water back into the environment properly. He said that this business is trying hard to overcome this problem.

Bill addressed the River Run issue.

Bruce replied. He said that currently there are 285 lots coming back to the municipality and will be put out for public auction. However, the Municipality wants to sell the lots as a package and needs permission from the courts in order to do so. He said that we are waiting for an answer back and should have one by March of 2013. They want to attract another developer, that is why they want to sell the lots as a package, however they want to make sure it is done properly this time.

Bill brought up what are the plans for the Crowsnest Center?

The Mayor also responded to this one. He said that we are down to the last few legal problems. He said that the lawyer's have been working hard to make sure that everything is correct so that we don't have another River Run problem on our hands. He said that the Municipality is being very careful. He did go on to say that it will be done within the next two weeks. He said that the company that plans on developing where the old hospital is, wants to hold a session with the residents of the Crowsnest Pass, in order to get the publics input. Bruce expects to have some progress made by Christmas or by next spring at the latest.

Bill then brought up the Unsightly Premises Bylaw. Bruce told us that currently the Peace Officers are dealing with Traffic Issues, but it will balance out over time.

He said that once things have fallen into place, the Peace Officers will divide their time to 1/3 bylaw, 1/3 education and 1/3 traffic.

He stated that the current bylaws need redrafting.

Myron then jumped in to tell us that council and administration is currently going over the bylaws and making the final decisions and revisions.

Bruce stated that "We want to be prepared!!! We see the glass as half full!!"

He said that the Government has identified the Crowsnest Pass as a future iconic area and that this is very good news for us.

He then told us that there are "two" very BIG, heavy industries that have contacted the Municipality and are considering coming here. He said that one of them will employ as many as 700 people or more. He said that the Crowsnest Pass may very well become the next Fort McMurray (but not near on such a big scale). He said that our council is just preparing for this future and we will appreciate all the steps that this council has currently taken and that it will all make sense, once that time comes.

Bill then asked the council members if they were happy with council's direction and what has transpired by them. He asked if they could respond individually.

Jerry had his say first. He stated that he was extremely happy with how council was moving forward. He then stated that that much of what is currently going on within the community and on Facebook is just rumors. That he is tired of it and that people need to stop starting and spreading these rumors. They need to deal in facts. 

The Mayor said that they can come to him, or any of the council or administration, for the facts, anytime!!!

Marlene Anctil stated that many people are intimidated by council and the mayor, that they are unapproachable.

Brian disagreed and said that many many people come to him all the time and he make the time for them. He said that he gets a lot of great feedback. People are constantly telling him that he should stick to his guns!! He told us that there are quite a few people that agree totally with council and what they are doing. However, they tell him that they and are afraid to speak up, for fear of being bullied by others within the community.

Emile jumped in and said that he can count on one hand how many people have approached him since he has got in on council. He says that he can walk down he streets and no one comes near him. He wishes that they would come to him. He said that he works at the landfill and his door is always open.

Bruce acknowledged that maybe Gail was right that council, including the Mayor, can seem a bit stand-offish and that maybe they need to work on that.

Larry Mitchell said that "We need to move ahead, not look behind us".

Andrew Saje asked why the Rate Payers Association even exists? What was it reactivated? Why with this council?
He suspects that it has to do with the lines of communication, between members of the community and council/administration. Andrew suggested that maybe we are not getting the information that we need.

Emile's comments were: "I do my research!! I do NOT speak out of turn. I get my information first."

He went on to say: "This council has done a lot of hard work. Everyone has done work in their areas of expertise. Council has worked together. The direction we are going is the direction we need to go!!"

As the councilor's finished, Bill then made his final point.

He told council that this community has seen no visible improvement since this council took over the reigns and it appears as though nothing will change, cost increases or not, because the profit from the increases are being totally wasted on projects and consultants that are going nowhere. He went on to say that the Strategic Plan which was to extend over a period of 10 years is being implemented in a community that the Plan was not intended for. He stated that it was intended for a successful and prosperous community of which we are not. He went on to say that in order to prosper, a community must have growth and anyone can see that we are stagnating and declining at a rapid rate and can ill afford to create the utopia suggested by the Mayor and his Strategic Plan.

Somehow then we got talking about protocols and policies.

Marion stated that there are new stringent protocols in place. All policies have to come before a Policy Committee. Then it has to have a wording developed and then back to the Policy Committee. Then it is presented to council. It might be thrown back to the Policy Committee for more work and then onto the G & P. ....

At this point, she was trying to tell us more, but Myron placed his hand on her knee under the table and she stopped talking.

It was brought up about the communication within the Municipality and their way of advertising and announcing issues & events. The Mayor said that they were doing it properly and soon most communities would be doing it the same way that we were doing it. He stated that newspaper advertising was going the way of the dinosaur. He said that it was just too bad that the newspapers had a problem with it, but it was the way of the future.

He stated that the Municipality's website provides the minutes of all meeting's, the morning after a meeting is held.

It was brought up by Bill that some things are not very clear. They are too vague.

Bruce made a note of that.

He said that when it comes to advertising and announcements, we actually have overkill, with how we inform the public.

He said that everywhere is now moving everything to the web, that we might as well get used to it!!

It was mentioned that this community is made up of many people including many senior's who do not own computer's or can not use one. Therefore they can not access this online information. They rely on the newspapers as a source for their information.

When the Mayor was asked about the swimming pool board and those volunteers, and if there was any truth to the rumor about them being "let go", Bruce very adamantly stated that this was the first that he heard of this new rumor. He then looked at Myron and said that he would have to "look into it". He also said the he doubted that it was any more than an ugly rumor.

We inquired about the ski hill. We were told that chair lifts and a few other things were planned for it to make it more viable and attractive to visitors, as a place to come and ski. Bruce then told us that all of this has been part of a plan that he has been in talks with Teck and Telus about. He said that there are no plans to shut it down.

After that there were a few random comments and then closing remarks by Bill.

He asked that council adhere to our requests or we are asking them to step down and resign from their positions. He said that we were still holding our meeting on Thursday night and will be circulating a petition to get Municipal Affairs to look into our council's spending.

Bruce warned us that we might want to do our homework first, because we may not want to go down that road.

Meeting adjourned at 5:40 p.m.


If I missed anything, I am sorry. I tried to be as thorough as possible.

I can tell you this, I wish I could be inside their heads, and privy to the secret looks that were being shot back and forth between our Mayor and the CAO. 

Blairmore Fire Station Chief Fired - Blairmore Fire Department Walk Out in Support

The following was posted on Facebook yesterday:


"I just wanted to get the attention of the Sun (Facebook friends the CNP too) on an issue in the Crowsnest Pass today. A 34 year volunteer firefighter (Fire Chief) was fired for reasons other than just cause. Reasons that are completely seemingly fabricated. After the municipal council made the decision to cancel the Blairmore Fire Department's 19th Annual Thunder In The Valley fireworks display they have been looking for ways to remove the head of the Blairmore Fire Department and anyone who is not willing to be bullied by the current Mayor and his puppets. Tonight municipal officials called a meeting with Station 24 (Blairmore Fire Department) explaining what has happened. All 11 members to were able to make the emergency meeting turned in their pagers, quitting the department at the disgust of which a 34 year volunteer was treated."

Followed today by the "Official" Announcement from the Municipality.


Municipality of Crowsnest Pass

Press Release

Effective October 1st, Station Chief Margetak has been relieved of his active duty. This action has prompted conclusion of additional fire service members from the Blairmore Station. The Municipality of Crowsnest Pass wishes to advise the public that a contingency plan is in place and a protocol has been established to ensure the ultimate safety of the public while the transition takes place. The Municipality of Crowsnest Pass wishes to thank Chief Margetak for the years of dedication and service and wishes to thank also those fire fighters that remain on active duty.


Update: Read Pass Promoter Article Online. Take the poll at the end of the article.


In a recent Crowsnest Pass Herald story, Margetak expressed concerns about organizational changes to Emergency Response services announced by the Municipality.  “I think it was poorly handled,” he reportedly said.

See article in Crowsnest Pass Herald:



It awfully coincidental that Jamie Margetek was interviewed, stating his opinion, and then he was fired. I wonder if Doug Cox, who also was interviewed, will be next? It seems as if anyone who does not agree with council is "let go", fired, or soon relieved of their position.


All of this stupid decision making, is just another nail in this councils coffin!!

I hope all the Fire Departments stand in solidarity and follow suit. Maybe then council will have to sit up and take notice. It happened once before and things got better.

But with this council, who knows. They seem to be making weirder and weirder choices. It's almost like they have gone mad!! Or maybe it's just their leader who has gone mad!! Whatever it is, it is scary because we, the people, are at his mercy and every strange whim that he has.


Global Lethbridge Interview:




Just updated on John Prince's Blog:

Quote "According to John's source from yesterday, today all but two (who couldn't be reached) firefighters in our Coleman Fire Department and all of our Hillcrest Fire Department firefighters have turned in their pagers today, as well. They've all walked out. No word yet on Bellevue."


Well, now the sh*t really is hitting the fan!! Will council finally realize the error of their ways? They are being forced into a corner. Will they back down or come out still fighting against the rest of the Pass population?

I think it's time for them to hang their heads in shame and admit their mistakes. Time for them to save even a small amount of face and man up to the reality of what they have been doing to this community and try to at least salvage what is left.



Crowsnest Pass Town Hall Meeting

If you are a resident of the Crowsnest Pass and have something to say about how the Mayor and council has been governing this community since being elected, in October of 2010, then now is the time to come out and have your say.

A Town Hall Meeting is planned for this Thursday (tomorrow) June 21st at 6:30 p.m.

Are you happy with the direction that things are going? Do you support our elected official's decisions? Or do you think that they are completely out-to-lunch?? Is council's spending in line with what you expected? Or do you think we are being taxed to death? Just where are our tax dollars going?? Does the Crowsnest Pass have anything to show for it??

Come out tomorrow, in support, or not, of our Mayor and councilmen. Tell them what you think and how you feel about the job that they have been doing for us?

Town Hall Meeting - Thursday June 21, 2012

Council extends an invitation to the Public to attend a Town Hall Meeting, Thursday, June 21st at 6:30 pm at the Elks Hall.

Located at 2025 – 129 Street Blairmore.

Beef on a Bun will be served prior to the meeting in the Elks Hall parking lot commencing at 5:00 pm.



Breaking Down the Numbers

Lately, quite a bit has been written and talked about regarding the number of Municipal employees we have, what we are currently paying them and where all the money is going.

I am the first to say that I have not directly looked into the matter. I guess I should take the time to be more informed.

It is glaringly apparent, that up until now, the Mayor and council have been very silent to the questions being posed by numerous members of this community. 

However, the other day councilor Brian Gallant decided to breach the silence and break down the numbers for us. Thank you Brian for having the gumption to step up and make your voice heard. We really have been waiting for some answers.

You can find the information on his Blog, titled "Municipal Staffing Facts"


Now after reading it through several times, I ran all the information through my mind. There was definitely some clarification made. However there were still obviously some glaring discrepancies between what we had a year ago and what we have now. All the numbers just don't seem to add up.

Now I must say Brian that if you did in fact stand up and voice your opposition against some of the decisions that council proposed and consequently made, then I sincerely thank you. We should all thank you. We need more of that.

I do also understand that not all of us can grasp or comprehend the complexities of it all. After all council is privy to more information than what the general public knows. We would really have to be in your shoes to be "in the know". 

So I guess the general public will have to be content to take your word for it. You are our council. You do, after all, know what is best for all of us.

Another thing that disturbs me is the lack of transparency that seems to plague this council, like it did the last. Maybe that just goes with the territory? I mean, what really does go on behind closed doors or "in camera"? I know what types of things that are supposed to go on in camera. But that does not mean that is exactly what happens.

Something else that really worries me is the continued absences of the same people from council meetings. First, they do not get to "have their say". Second, they knew what they were getting in for when they ran. If they can not commit to something as important as attending a council meeting, as a council member,  then maybe they should have not run or maybe instead now bow out and we can find someone else to replace them. It's been done before.
However, I guess we will have to make do with who does attend and be grateful for it.

The few council member's who are speaking out, are desperately trying to put a positive spin on everything. I don't blame them. I for one, am all for being positive. I will say that I am positively going to run for council next election.

Then I can positively say that I am privy to "all the information" that the privilege of the position holds. Then all of my unanswered questions positively will be answered. 

Update - Council Stuff and Cemetery Clean-up - November 2nd

Well, I guess I am just as guilty of having nothing to say lately....
 
There really isn't a lot to say about our new council yet.
 
They were sworn in last week. Committee Appointments have been made. The first regular council meeting was tonight.
 
I have been just sitting back watching and letting the new council settle into their respective roles. As we all know, everything happens in it's own time.
 
Here are the  2010 - 2011 Council Committee Appointments - 
 
AAMDC - Mayor Decoux
 
Affordable Housing - Councillor Gallant
 
Agricultural Services Board - Councillor Saindon
 
Alberta Southwest Regional Alliance - Mayor Decoux
 
Assessment Appeal - Councillors Gallant, Lonsbury, Gail (2011 if no regional board in place)
 
CN/PC Waste Management - Councillors Gail, Lonsbury, Gallant
 
CNP Senior Housing - Councillors Gail, Lonsbury
 
Crowsnest Advisory Ad-hoc Action Committee - Councillors Gail, Lonsbury, Gallant
 
Culture and Recreation - Councillor Saje
 
Family & Community Support Services - Councillor Lonsbury
 
Governance & Priorities Committee - All
 
Library & C.A.R.L.S. - Councillor Saindon*
 
Management Negotiating Committee - Councillor Mitchell, Mayor Decoux
 
Mayors & Reeves - Mayor Decoux
 
Municipal Heritage Board - Councillor Gallant
 
Oldman River Regional Services Commission (ORRSC) - Councillors Mitchell, Lonsbury *
 
Protective Services - Councillor Mitchell
 
Ski Hill Authority - Councillor Saje
 
Snowmobile/Trails - Councillor Saje
 
Spray Lakes Public Advisory Committee - Councillor Saindon
 
Subdivision & Development Appeal - Councillor Gallant*
 
Subdivision & Development Authority - Councillors Saje, Mitchell *
 
MAYOR IS EX OFFICIO ON ALL BOARDS & COMMITTEES EXCEPT DESIGNATED (*)
 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 
The Old Bellevue Cemetery clean-up happened last Saturday. There were just four of us there. I was a little disappointed that more people didn't care enough to show up. There was a lot to do.
 
The trees that were over-hanging the grave sites and fallen down, were pruned and branches taken down. (Thank you - Brian Gallant, for that)
 
The branches were then moved and piled into one spot for later disposal. (Thank you to Brian, Guy Baird and Cassidy Gustavson, for that)
 
The strange piles of dirt, that were scattered everywhere, were raked out and levelled to the ground. (A BIG thanks to Cassidy for doing a lot of that back-breaking work)
 
Beer cans, bottles and broken glass were picked up and disposed of.
 
There are still many piles of horse crap everywhere. This is both disgusting and disgraceful. How could anyone let their horses graze there. It is a sacred place. A place that should denote respect. Shame on whoever has let this atrocity happen. You should be made to clean it all up!!
 
We ran out of steam and time, or we would have cleaned up the horse mess ourselves.
 
The cemetery is actually quite large and it would have taken a whole team of many more people, than what we actually had, and an entire day, to do everything that needed to be done.
 
Plans are to go back and finish, as time and weather permits.
 
We are still waiting to hear who is directly responsible for the upkeep and repair of this Old Bellevue cemetery. Several people have been notified of the condition of it, and have promised to pass the issue along to the right people. In the mean time, we will still do what we can to finish cleaning it up.
 
Anyone still wishing to help or provide their services, can contact me, or can go out their themselves and do some of the work. Good Samaritans are always appreciated.
 
Things that still need to be done:
 
  • Horse droppings need to be cleaned up and removed.
 
  • Still some piles of dirt need to be spread and levelled.
 
  • Refuse pile needs to be hauled away.
 
  • Main gate needs to be fixed - top set of hinges is broken.
 
  • Numerous other fences need repairing.
 
  • Several headstones need replacing and repairing.
 
  • Over-all entire ground needs to be levelled and lower spots need to be raised up, to prevent further flooding.
 
  • Sunken sites need to be raised up, to level of the rest surrounding ground.
 
  • It would be nice to see a couple of benches put out there.
 
Well, that is the update for today.
 
Stay tuned for more.